Q&A: Can Playing Be Against the Rules?

Q. Our building is discriminating against children. The board has just purchased very expensive lobby furniture ($6,000 per chair) with a white rug. It has now passed a rule that children must not play in the lobby. If they are “caught” playing, the first offense carries a fine of $100. The second offense is $200, etc.

The new rule doesn’t define “playing”; nor does it distinguish between noisy playing and quiet playing. In fact, the first damage to our new furniture was by a real estate agent! Since we now have many new families in our 400-unit building with children, this seems excessively harsh. How do we handle something like this? We only have three meetings a year (by decision of the board!).

                                   —The Kids Are Alright

A. “Understanding the reach of rules imposed by a condominium board is very important to know whether or not a particular rule is discriminatory and/or in violation of the law,” says attorney Elyse Wolff of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, which has offices in Woodbridge, Roseland, and New York. “The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq. (FHA), prohibits providers of housing from discriminating in connection with the sale, rental, and other housing-relating transactions against persons because of, among other things, their ‘familial status.’ Familial status includes families with at least one child under the age of 18. Depending upon the wording of the new rule that your association board has adopted, it may be in violation of the FHA. For example, if the rule specifically prevents ‘children’ from playing in the newly renovated lobby as opposed to ‘no playing’ in general (applicable to both adults and children), then the rule may be in violation of the FHA. If the rule does not address adults and children equally, unless it is a health and safety based rule such as the use of exercise equipment or supervision while swimming, or unless your community is an age-restricted community (which it does not sound like it is), then the rule may be considered discriminatory. The fact that the furniture was already damaged by an adult is a perfect example as to why rules should not single out children.

“If the definition of ‘playing’ is unclear, then you have the right to ask for an explanation. If the board is unwilling to provide you with such an explanation, then your association should have an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) policy in place which you should take advantage of. Through that process you will hopefully get a better understanding of the meaning of the term. Pursuant to the Condominium Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8B-14(k), every association is required to offer ‘a fair and efficient procedure for the resolution of housing-related disputes.’ ‘Housing-related disputes’ is broadly defined and would encompass disputes surrounding this new rule. If your association does not have an ADR policy, you should make them aware that having one is a requirement.


Related Articles

Making—and Enforcing—House Rules

Fairness & Consistency Are Key

Fines and Penalties

Using Them Fairly and Effectively

Q&A: Neighbor's Kid Is Driving Me Crazy

Q&A: Neighbor's Kid Is Driving Me Crazy

Q&A: Amending Governing Documents and the Radburn Act

Q&A: Amending Governing Documents and the Radburn Act

Updating Your Documents

Is It Time for a Facelift?

Living by the Rules

Making—and Enforcing—House Rules