- Home
- Law & Legislation
- Common Lawsuits in HOAs
Common Lawsuits in HOAs
Strong Suits
Article Options
Homeowners associations are governed by a private board, generally comprised of residents of the condominium. Just because board members are unpaid volunteers, however, does not exempt them from exposure to lawsuits. Indeed, HOA board members are held to the same standard as their for-profit corporate counterparts where the law is concerned.
According to the Community Associations Institute (CAI), 54.6 million people lived in private associations in 2005—up from just 9.6 million 25 years ago. With so many residents, lawsuits are an inevitability. A homeowners association's exposure could range from mismanagement of funds by a board of directors or a board member, to slip-and-fall lawsuits for negligent sidewalk maintenance during an ice storm, to disputes with contractors, employees and residents.
What kinds of legal actions are the most common in New Jersey? How can homeowners associations lessen their risk of exposure? What steps can be taken to redress small problems before mountains are made of proverbial molehills? And are lawsuits as ubiquitous as they seem? The following may shed light on these questions and more.
It's the Money, Stupid
If there's one thread that joins the disparate types of lawsuits seen in the state involving homeowners associations, it's green in color.
"It's always about money," says Karim Kaspar, an attorney with the Law Offices of Lowenstein Sandler in Roseland.
Probably the most common type of lawsuit involves injuries sustained on the premises due to alleged negligence—the so-called slip-and-fall. Ice is not removed promptly from the front steps, someone slips and breaks their ankle, and presto—instant lawsuit.
Surprisingly, for as common as lawsuits are in HOAs and the amount of time they take up, it's not necessarily the association's general counsel who always goes to bat for the HOA in such situations. "Not much of our time is taken up with working on the really common cases," says David Byrne, a shareholder attorney with Stark & Stark in Lawrenceville. "In general, the insurance company will appoint the lawyer for such claims."
That's because these kinds of claims are generally covered under the homeowners association's liability insurance. In a slip-and-fall case, the board would contact their insurance carrier, who would assign an attorney to handle the case. Personal injury claims, even if paid for by liability insurance, can make rates go up substantially.
If the condominium is large enough to have employees, this increases legal exposure. Employees must be managed, which means hiring them—and sometimes, firing them. This exposes the board to possible discrimination claims for violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits job discrimination by gender, race, religion, country of origin and age.
The association is also responsible—to a degree—for how its employees behave. If, for example, a gardener employed by the association makes lewd comments or advances upon some of the residents, the association could be liable if the board knew about the problem but did nothing (or not enough) to correct it.
Fortunately, such claims are relatively rare. With employees, the most common claims involve workers' compensation, for which associations that employ workers have insurance.
Board vs. Contractor vs. Residents
It is also common, Kaspar says, for disputes between boards and contractors to escalate into litigation. "Board members are volunteers, and maybe they're not in the unit all year-round. In those situations, it's easy for disputes with contractors to arise."
Judith Jennings, who has her own law office in Medford, notes that disputes frequently arise concerning building defects. For example, a homeowners association could sue a contractor for installing a faulty air conditioning system; the contractor might then countersue, claiming the problem was with the maintenance, not the unit itself.
Then there are the internal fights, one that pits neighbor against neighbor, or resident against board.
"These usually arise out of a perceived right to services," explains Robert Shanahan, of Kilcommons Shanahan in Annandale. "HOA residents can have a landlord-tenant mentality, and they don't pay their dues if something goes wrong. The board moves to recover the fees, and is hit with a countersuit."
For example, a resident might have a broken toilet in his apartment. He insists that the board have the toilet repaired, although the association's bylaws may explicitly state that he is responsible for the toilet. In protest, he decides to stop paying his dues.
These kinds of cases rarely end well. Residents, of course, are forbidden by the bylaws to withhold maintenance fees, so these cases almost always work against them, and they wind up covering the board's legal costs out-of-pocket.
Finally, there are suits that can be brought against the individual board members. Because no sane person would expose herself to such liability for an exacting volunteer position, boards take out Directors & Officers (D&O) insurance policies to cover their members should the need arise.
Under the so-called fidelity and honesty provisions of D&O policies, board members are not liable for honest mistakes.
"If they are acting according to the advice of their attorneys and other professionals," Kaspar says, "that's OK. If they act arbitrarily and don't follow advice, that's when they get into trouble."
If laws are broken, however, all bets are off. "Fraud is fraud," Kaspar says, "and a board member who commits fraud would be convicted criminally and sued civilly."
Improving the Odds
If board members are supposed to listen to their professionals, what do professionals advise, to lessen the chance of litigation? Given that many of the lawsuits involve neighbors, most pros stress the importance of communication.
"Have a fair system where you can hear people," advises Shanahan. "Show you're willing to listen to their grievances. And try to work it out."
Anything that improves communication among neighbors is a good idea, Shanahan continues, including periodic newsletters from the board, even a summer barbecue for residents can foster better, friendlier relationships wherein people are more likely to work out their differences amicably than resort to litigation.
"We've lost the ability to work things out," he says. "Now, everything is a perceived threat. If you can show that the people in your building are nice people, it brings the pressure down—it brings the volume down a lot."
If tensions escalate, the first step is to try and defuse the situation outside of a courtroom. New Jersey state law requires that an alternate dispute board be the first step in resolving grievances—in fact, if this step isn't attempted, a judge will throw out any lawsuit of this kind.
According to Joel Meskin, vice president of community association products at McGowan & Co., an Ohio-based insurer specializing in HOA coverage, most lawsuits are avoidable.
"There's a lot you can do to avoid claims," says Meskin. "Know your bylaws and any other governing documents, and make sure that new association members receive and sign off on the bylaws and governing documents when they move in. Also, avoid emotional involvement [in disputes]—that can lead to some of the greatest wastes of time and resources." Meskin also strongly recommends alternative dispute resolution between board and residents, management and residents, and residents with other residents.
To that end, Shanahan suggests working with nearby homeowners associations.
"Even if it's arbitration, you make a ruling," he says. "If it does go to court, the judge either agrees or disagrees—you're not going to get in trouble."
As lawsuits are inevitable because it's the nature of the beast, Shanahan suggests having as much money as possible on hand to cover unanticipated legal expenses, "without being ridiculous."
Jennings and Meskin both agree that communication is the single greatest tool in avoiding lawsuits and harmony-destroying squabbles between neighbors. "It's difficult for some people to attend board meetings," Jennings notes. She recommends posting non-privileged information on a community website, so everyone can feel that they're in the loop and not being kept in the dark about the HOAs goings-on.
"Communication is the key to resolving problems," adds Meskin. "An association should consider having a mechanism in place for the community association to address conflicts and grievances."
More Advice
For her part, Jennings suggests letting a professional management company do the heavy lifting, even if your homeowners association is small. "In the long run, it saves money," she says. Also, Jennings points out that since managers don't live on-site, they don't have to worry about dealing with a neighbor. In this vein, there has been talk in legal circles about introducing the idea of professional, compensated board members but this hasn't caught on yet.
Kaspar has different advice. "First, don't go outside the scope of your by-laws," he says. "Lawsuits commonly arise when boards act outside their scope of authority, such as borrowing money, when it's not explicitly stated that they can do so."
Second, Kaspar says, rely on the advice of a good attorney and other professionals.
Shanahan, too, prefers that disputes are settled out of court. "The problem with court is, someone will lose. And they may never talk to the other person again."
The Good Ol' Days?
While the consensus holds that there are more lawsuits now than in the past, Shanahan says you have to go back decades to the 1960s, when many new regulations were codified, to get to a time when litigation was not rampant.
"It used to be, you'd never think of suing because you ate something bad at a restaurant," says Jennings. "You'd just let them know and that was that. But now…"
Does the preponderance of lawsuits stem only from the new regulations in the Sixties, or is there more to it? Shanahan's theory is that Baby Boomers have higher expectations than their forbears, and when those expectations aren't met—and met promptly—they get angry. And anger means lawsuits. (Full disclosure: Shanahan just makes the Baby Boomer cut-off).
Jennings believes the perception that an HOA's insurance company has "deep pockets" convinces some would-be suit-filers to move forward—although if the ones filing suit are residents, they eventually will pay the price in future dues or assessments.
Whatever the reason, litigation is here to stay. Lawsuits are part of the business. As Shanahan puts it, "The only thing that changes are the people involved and the amount of anger."
And it's important to take threats of legal action seriously, says Byrne. "A lot [of claims] are legit," he says. "It wouldn't be true to say that every lawsuit was frivolous."
Given that, it's vital that your own HOA be prepared for the inevitable with good legal counsel and a clean financial house. And in the meantime, perhaps you can prevent some of that inevitable litigation with good communication between board and association members and by fostering a more robust sense of community among your members.
Greg Olear is a freelance writer living in Northern New Jersey.
Comments
You have no idea how horrible a management company can be unless you speak to me. I have been harassed for years with the property manager convincing many people to do very bad things against me. I will start with a warrant out for my arrest because I didn't renew my dog's license and this was done by the PM. Then the PM convinced the board to change the roof and skylights on 4 condos in our community and everything done was against the bylaws because they forced us to get new skylights when we had the best ones ever with all the upgrades and drainage system. My new skylights are defective since the roofer sawed them to fit the skylight homes. I had skylights like Pella's best ones and now I have Home Depot's which cost $233 and are not laminated and if the thin cheap skylight breaks the glass will fall right into my condo. I got fake fines which I wouldn't pay because they were lies made up by the same PM. Because of those fake fines I was not able to use the clubhouse and pool for 7 years so far. The last thing that happened was the management company for some reason with the help of the board and condo attorney filed a summons against my daughter and myself which the judge threw out and was going to d8ismiss but the condo attorney cancelled it after making a fortune when it was all lies...it was for injunctive relief against my daughter and me and I never leave my condo. The very last thing that occurred is the mgm. co. tried to make me believe an insurance claim was denied. Finally after confronting the 2nd bunch of adjustors who visiting my condo after finding out they denied the claim, someone got scared and the mgm. co. decided to throw me a few crumbs and offered me $4900 for a lot of damage when I know the claim they are pretending was denied was paid out in Jan. or Feb. of 2012. The mgm. co. showed me a copy of a check from April 14,, 1012 and I know that check wasn't for my claim as the president of the insurance co. told me Jan. or Feb. of 2012. Believe it or not there are some insurance co. workers who are involved with this management company which amazes me that somoone would put their job on the line but what do I know. The check that was sent to me was made out by the treasurer of the board but with it came a letter from the condo attorney which said if I cash the check it means I will not hold the board responsible for any future payment. I never heard of such a thing being the board's decision as it usually is done by the insurance co. I believe the claim moeny that was received and never put in the associations account was split amount some board members and the mgm. co. and the board members got scared so the mgm. co. said we will maike the condo lawyer write a letter saying that if the person entitled to the claim money they will agree not to bother the board members for more money,. I think this is totally fraud done by someone who has been having horrible things done to the condo owners. Believe it or not this saqme PM fined a deceased school tearcher after she dies for not replacing her light bulb outside her condo and the PM went to the closing and collected $4750 from the 2 sons of the school teacher and the association never saw it. I am wondering who the heck these people are. Thought you might find this interesting. I am the most honest person and there is nothing in this note that is not true. Sadly there is a lot more that I didn''t include. . of what was done to me but it caused me and my family to not be able to use the clubhouse and pool . I still am waiting
HOAs are a joke and only the lawyers are laughing. You write that the lawyers are giving advice to avoid lawsuits....you are patheticaly ignorant of what is going on in HOAs. HOA attorneys ENCOURAGE conflict with the hope that a lawsuit erupts. This is money in the bank and win lose or draw, HOA attorneys ALWAYS win. At the same time, HOA attorneys are lobbying our legislature (Community Association Institute IS the lawyer lobby) to maintain the status quo of virtualy no state oversight or homeowner protections from amatuer run HOAs. Wouldn't it be nice if a homeowner could call the Attorney Generals office and demand enforcement of homeowner friendly law? HOA attorneys fight tooth and nail to prevent this. Sickening! Like millions of Americans who know the score, you could not GIVE me a home in an HOA.
Dear Evelyn: I do not understand why you did not get a bulldog for an attorney and go after this slime. Sometimes you need a lawyer - a real fighter - to put someone in their place. Or even go to your local TV station with video of what was happening to you.
Our board went against the covenants and by laws to add friends to the board. That is right no voting of the homeowners and now they want to pay 20,000 of HOA money to change the by laws as well as Arc rules. What can we do?
There is usually a tightly knit, brick-like alliance between coop attorneys and management companies - most of whom are members of the Community Association Institute. This organization has a very strong lobby that has blocked legislation to strengthen the rights of shareholders. Shareholders and condo owners are at a real disadvantage in NJ. Check it out and contact your local legislator to find out about pending legislation that would help us all - but is stuck in committee.
Can a condominium association in NJ spend monthly condo fees to benefit residents over non resident homeowners?
You got that right! I had my State Rep sponsor a bill that would impose some constraints and oversight on HOA boards. We all win with checks and balances right???? WRONG...the Community Associations Institute...the lawyers who profit from the theft of our equity and money in the bank....fought tooth and nail to prevent this or any law that would threaten their gravy train.... The bill was sent to "study"...which my Rep said meant "oblivian"

